…the proper response to a lousy idea is not to stop thinking. It is to come up with a better idea.
The great advance of personal computers was not the computing power per se but the fact that it brought it right to your face, that you had control over it, that were confronted with it and could steer it.
We are infected by our own misunderstanding of how our own minds work.
The nature of an innovation is that it will arise at a fringe where it can afford to become prevalent enough to establish its usefulness without being overwhelmed by the inertia of the orthodox system.
An organization’s intelligence is distributed to the point of being ubiquitous.
But when you are embodied in a location, in a physical plant, in a set of people, and in a common history, that constrains your evolution and your ability to evolve in certain directions.
Species go extinct because there are historical contraints built into a given body or a given design.
Organisms by their design are not made to adapt too far.
An organization’s reason for being, like that of any organism, is to help the parts that are in relationship to each other, to be able to deal with change in the environment.
It’s generally much easier to kill an organization than to change it substantially.
A brain is a society of very small, simple modules that cannot be said to be thinking, that are not smart in themselves. But when you have a network of them together, out of that arises a kind of smartness.