There’s no longer any surprise in noting that China has grave environmental problems.
The environmental movement doesn’t have many deserters and has a high level of recruitment. Eventually, there will be open war.
Stark inequality, poverty, and unemployment are driving increased social unrest and, consequently, social and economic risk. Environmental deterioration may well intensify social inequality.
Beyond reducing individual use, one of our top priorities must be to move from fossil fuels to energy that has fewer detrimental effects on water supplies and fewer environmental impacts overall.
Global markets must be balanced by global values such as respect for human rights and international law, democracy, security and sustainable economic and environmental development.
I feel it is urgently necessary to train people who are capable of tackling the various problems we face today in regards to environmental turmoil and the relevancy of clothing.
Our view has been that unless stringent environmental tests can be passed by would-be frackers, then no fracking should take place.
This whole idea that we address environmental issues by not doing stuff just doesn’t work.
I align myself with almost all researchers in assuming that anything we do is a composite of whatever genetic limitations were given to us by our parents and whatever kinds of environmental opportunities are available.
I reflect back 35 years ago, and look how far we have come in America with our environmental policy to improve the conditions of our air and water, and we have had some real successes.
From year to year, environmental changes are incremental and often barely register in our lives, but from evolutionary or geological perspectives, what is happening is explosive change.
Technology is vital. We have to have development in new technology if we’re going to solve these environmental problems without throwing humanity back in poverty.
For businesses, biomimicry is about bringing a new discipline – biology – to the design table. It’s not to write an environmental impact statement, as most biologists in business do right now.
I was surprised to see how much the mainstream environmental movement hates the ELF.
It really disturbs me that the environmental movement has been co-opted by creation-worshippers instead of being encouraged by the Creator-worshippers.
Like I said, I’m more worried long term about the environmental issues then the use of arms.
Environmental concern is a phenomena that tends to rise in a nation after a certain level of wealth.
I think future engineered species could be the source of food, hopefully a source of energy, environmental remediation and perhaps replacing the petrochemical industry.
The position I took at the time was that we hadn’t really examined any of the potential environmental consequences of introducing genetically modified organisms.
As the leader of an oil-producing nation, I know how hard it can be to prioritize environmental issues, but the short-term risk to our economic security is far outweighed by the potential risk to our national and regional security.
There is a need to spread more awareness about environmental issues.
I don’t know anything about propaganda for Chinese reunification. I only know about charity and environmental work. I just want to do good.
Energy cogeneration on Capitol Hill makes economic and environmental sense and should be pursued for those reasons.
Environmental disaster is the gravest threat to China’s continued development. That’s according to me, but it is not some wacko view.
We ignore slow environmental changes unless they are crisis-driven, such as hurricanes in Florida.
